I don't see how bed tax money earmarked for affordable housing can be used to build a homeless shelter which is provided free to homeless people, who cannot be required to pay for staying and showering there, if the city wants to arrest and jail them for sleeping and bathing outside instead. Ref. The Pottinger Case, which the ACLU brought against the City of Miami, because it was using its police to try to drive homeless people out of the city for sleeping, cooking, camping and relieving themselves outside.
I don't see how bed tax money emarked for affordable housing can be spent on anything but affordable housing in any event.
During a neighborhood meeting on Angela Street yesterday afternoon,re the new Peary Court Development, City Commissioner Tony Yaniz, the featured guest, said far better for that land to be turned into affordable housing. He said far better to put affordable housing on the Easter Seals property. So, I asked him how he felt about turning Truman Waterfront into affordable housing run by the Housing Authority? He said he didn't know if that would be legal, he thought Truman Waterfront was supposed to be a public park. Maybe part of it could be afforddable housing. And there is the 6.6 acres which Bahama Village was supposed get. Which was stolen by the city, I said. Tony nodded yes.
My understanding is, Truman waterfront was supposed to pay for itself and was supposed to benefit Bahama Village, first and foremost. Trying to help Bahama Village was why the Navy deeded Truman Waterfront to the city.
Be that as it may, it was because the city was sued by the condo association across the canal from KOTS on the Sheriff's land that the city agreed with the plaintiffs to relocate the city's homeless shelter. It was only later that the Sheriff said he didn't want the city's homeless shelter on his land any longer.
Tony Yaniz joked at the Angela Street meeting, that the Sheriff had said didn't want his female deputies around homeless people, and the Department of Justice had said it didn't want homeless underneath the DOJ building in the Sheriff's Complex, with young females overhead. But the Sheriff and DOJ were okay with a homeless shelter being next door to a county senior assisted living facility, the city's tropical forest and botanical garden, near an elementary school, near homes where families lived with young children.
And also adjacent to the city's championship golf course, I thought.
In fact, this ex-Key West street person says some homeless people are truly dangerous; most of them are addicts; many of them are mentally ill; and many of them have seirous communical diseases, MRSA tops the horribles list. I say it is madness to put a new homeless shelter at the Easter Seals property. The only sane, and the only safe place in Key West to put a new homeless shelter is somewhere on the Sheriff's land.
Furthermore, the golf course community association is represented by the same lawyer, Bart Smith, who sued the city over KOTS being built without permits on the Sheriff's land. The golf course community association has told the City Commission, I was at that commission meeting and heard it, that they will sue the city if it tries to put the new homeless shelter in the Easter Seals building, adjacent to the golf course, which is operated, I think, by Bart Smith's parents, who, I also think, developed the golf course condos, or some of them.
Tony Yaniz said at the Angela neighborhood meeting that he wants the new homeless shelter put on Big Coppit Key. He doesn't care if homeless people don't want to travel that distance to use it. Problem with that is the Potinger case. Homeless people cannot be arrested and jailed for living outside,unless there is a homeless shelter available to them and they refuse to use it. And, if they cannot get to the shelter on their own, they have to be taken there by the police, or by someone, and only if they refuse transportation to the shelter can they then be arrested and jailed.
Another problem, simply practical, is homeless people will not, in the main, travel from Key West to a homeless shelter on Big Coppit. A shelter built there will be a white elephant.
At the county-city homeless summit, and before that, many times, this ex-practicing lawyer suggested the Sheriff needs to be given incentive to have the new homeless shelter on his land. So far, the city has not offered the Sheriff incentive.
Instead, the city arrests and takes homeless people to the Sheriff's jail, over homeless crimes which are not enforced against anyone else – drinking in public, loitering just off public sidewealks on private property, sleeping outside.
Homeless people cost more, usually, for the Sheriff to look after, because most of them are addicts and need to be detoxed; many of them have diseases the Sheriff has to treat; many of them are mentally deranged, which the Sheriff has to manage.
Some homeless inmates the Sheriff sends to the hosptial, which has to treat them for free. Some of them the city police take homeless people, or send them in ambulances, straight to the hospital on the ambulance company and the hospital's dime.
Key West's homeless policy is causing the Sheriff a lot of trouble in his jail, and is costing him a lot of money, which the taxpayers are funding. The hospital suffers similarly, for it cost far more to house and treat a homeless person in the hospital, than in the jail.
I suggested that the city build its on drunk tank for homeless addicts, and take them there and hold them there until the next morning, and then release them and put them to finding their way back to where the were arrested and left their bicycles locked up, or not locked up. Make getting arrested for drinking outside a bad experience for them, but not for the Sheriff and the hospital.
At the homeless summit, County Commissioner David Rice, a psychologist,who ran the Guidance Clinics of the Keys for many years, who knows plenty about addicts therefore, said he liked my idea and would look into seeing how the Marchaman Act would be used to do just what I had suggested.
If the Sheriff is not providing Key West housing for the city's homeless drunks, perhaps the Sheriff will be more inclined to put up with the city's new homeless shelter being located somewhere else on his land.
As for affordable housing, Tony Yaniz said at yesterday's Angela Street meeting that a studio in Key West is $1,400 a month. How is that affordable housing? How can the people who take care of the needs of what people more financially well-off can afford, how can gardners, waitresses, bar cooks, fishing boat mates, etc. afford $1,400 a month for a studio?
Tony's right, you know. My definition of affordable housing is, if a waitress can afford it on her salary, then it's affordable. Otherwise, calling it affordable is a joke, a lie.
I don't see how bed tax money earmarked for affordable housing can be used to build a homeless shelter which is provided free to homeless people, who cannot be required to pay for staying and showering there, if the city wants to arrest and jail them for sleeping and bathing outside instead. Ref. The Pottinger Case, which the ACLU brought against the City of Miami, because it was using its police to try to drive homeless people out of the city for sleeping, cooking, camping and relieving themselves outside.
I don't see how bed tax money emarked for affordable housing can be spent on anything but affordable housing in any event.
During a neighborhood meeting on Angela Street yesterday afternoon,re the new Peary Court Development, City Commissioner Tony Yaniz, the featured guest, said far better for that land to be turned into affordable housing. He said far better to put affordable housing on the Easter Seals property. So, I asked him how he felt about turning Truman Waterfront into affordable housing run by the Housing Authority? He said he didn't know if that would be legal, he thought Truman Waterfront was supposed to be a public park. Maybe part of it could be afforddable housing. And there is the 6.6 acres which Bahama Village was supposed get. Which was stolen by the city, I said. Tony nodded yes.
My understanding is, Truman waterfront was supposed to pay for itself and was supposed to benefit Bahama Village, first and foremost. Trying to help Bahama Village was why the Navy deeded Truman Waterfront to the city.
Be that as it may, it was because the city was sued by the condo association across the canal from KOTS on the Sheriff's land that the city agreed with the plaintiffs to relocate the city's homeless shelter. It was only later that the Sheriff said he didn't want the city's homeless shelter on his land any longer.
Tony Yaniz joked at the Angela Street meeting, that the Sheriff had said didn't want his female deputies around homeless people, and the Department of Justice had said it didn't want homeless underneath the DOJ building in the Sheriff's Complex, with young females overhead. But the Sheriff and DOJ were okay with a homeless shelter being next door to a county senior assisted living facility, the city's tropical forest and botanical garden, near an elementary school, near homes where families lived with young children.
And also adjacent to the city's championship golf course, I thought.
In fact, this ex-Key West street person says some homeless people are truly dangerous; most of them are addicts; many of them are mentally ill; and many of them have seirous communical diseases, MRSA tops the horribles list. I say it is madness to put a new homeless shelter at the Easter Seals property. The only sane, and the only safe place in Key West to put a new homeless shelter is somewhere on the Sheriff's land.
Furthermore, the golf course community association is represented by the same lawyer, Bart Smith, who sued the city over KOTS being built without permits on the Sheriff's land. The golf course community association has told the City Commission, I was at that commission meeting and heard it, that they will sue the city if it tries to put the new homeless shelter in the Easter Seals building, adjacent to the golf course, which is operated, I think, by Bart Smith's parents, who, I also think, developed the golf course condos, or some of them.
Tony Yaniz said at the Angela neighborhood meeting that he wants the new homeless shelter put on Big Coppit Key. He doesn't care if homeless people don't want to travel that distance to use it. Problem with that is the Potinger case. Homeless people cannot be arrested and jailed for living outside,unless there is a homeless shelter available to them and they refuse to use it. And, if they cannot get to the shelter on their own, they have to be taken there by the police, or by someone, and only if they refuse transportation to the shelter can they then be arrested and jailed.
Another problem, simply practical, is homeless people will not, in the main, travel from Key West to a homeless shelter on Big Coppit. A shelter built there will be a white elephant.
At the county-city homeless summit, and before that, many times, this ex-practicing lawyer suggested the Sheriff needs to be given incentive to have the new homeless shelter on his land. So far, the city has not offered the Sheriff incentive.
Instead, the city arrests and takes homeless people to the Sheriff's jail, over homeless crimes which are not enforced against anyone else – drinking in public, loitering just off public sidewealks on private property, sleeping outside.
Homeless people cost more, usually, for the Sheriff to look after, because most of them are addicts and need to be detoxed; many of them have diseases the Sheriff has to treat; many of them are mentally deranged, which the Sheriff has to manage.
Some homeless inmates the Sheriff sends to the hosptial, which has to treat them for free. Some of them the city police take homeless people, or send them in ambulances, straight to the hospital on the ambulance company and the hospital's dime.
Key West's homeless policy is causing the Sheriff a lot of trouble in his jail, and is costing him a lot of money, which the taxpayers are funding. The hospital suffers similarly, for it cost far more to house and treat a homeless person in the hospital, than in the jail.
I suggested that the city build its on drunk tank for homeless addicts, and take them there and hold them there until the next morning, and then release them and put them to finding their way back to where the were arrested and left their bicycles locked up, or not locked up. Make getting arrested for drinking outside a bad experience for them, but not for the Sheriff and the hospital.
At the homeless summit, County Commissioner David Rice, a psychologist,who ran the Guidance Clinics of the Keys for many years, who knows plenty about addicts therefore, said he liked my idea and would look into seeing how the Marchaman Act would be used to do just what I had suggested.
If the Sheriff is not providing Key West housing for the city's homeless drunks, perhaps the Sheriff will be more inclined to put up with the city's new homeless shelter being located somewhere else on his land.
As for affordable housing, Tony Yaniz said at yesterday's Angela Street meeting that a studio in Key West is $1,400 a month. How is that affordable housing? How can the people who take care of the needs of what people more financially well-off can afford, how can gardners, waitresses, bar cooks, fishing boat mates, etc. afford $1,400 a month for a studio?
Tony's right, you know. My definition of affordable housing is, if a waitress can afford it on her salary, then it's affordable. Otherwise, calling it affordable is a joke, a lie.