The article makes it clear that what Mr. Showalter disputes are Bill Kauck’s statements. The article states he “claims” what is then clearly in quotation marks. Even Bill in the conclusion says he is speculating about the cars. Matthew’s dispute is clearly with his neighbor, whom he calls a drunk and makes other accusations far more inflammatory and reckless than anything Bill is quoted saying.
There is no disputing that SHARK has done a terrible job after improperly wresting the contract away from the beloved and hyper-competent SUFA (remember the quarantine? Closing Big Pine?). The article accurately reports what SHARK’s leaders were doing in response to their problems. Mr. Showalter makes it all about his relation with his neighbor, while possibly slandering their accountant in passing. Matthew owes KONK Life an apology, not the other way around.
The article makes it clear that what Mr. Showalter disputes are Bill Kauck’s statements. The article states he “claims” what is then clearly in quotation marks. Even Bill in the conclusion says he is speculating about the cars. Matthew’s dispute is clearly with his neighbor, whom he calls a drunk and makes other accusations far more inflammatory and reckless than anything Bill is quoted saying.
There is no disputing that SHARK has done a terrible job after improperly wresting the contract away from the beloved and hyper-competent SUFA (remember the quarantine? Closing Big Pine?). The article accurately reports what SHARK’s leaders were doing in response to their problems. Mr. Showalter makes it all about his relation with his neighbor, while possibly slandering their accountant in passing. Matthew owes KONK Life an apology, not the other way around.