A couple of pointed questions:
Why would the most explosive case of the FBI, a really hot potato, where there would be no likely winners, not be submitted to a grand jury for finding facts, subpoenas, locking people into sworn testimony and having the Grand Jury decide? Why indeed?
Why would the #4 guy, Strzok, impose himself as being the “case agent?” After all he is a manager and appears to be a very poor investigator.
And, finally, who reviewed his work?
A couple of pointed questions:
Why would the most explosive case of the FBI, a really hot potato, where there would be no likely winners, not be submitted to a grand jury for finding facts, subpoenas, locking people into sworn testimony and having the Grand Jury decide? Why indeed?
Why would the #4 guy, Strzok, impose himself as being the “case agent?” After all he is a manager and appears to be a very poor investigator.
And, finally, who reviewed his work?